Chris Rodesch vs James Kent Trotter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jun at 04:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Rodesch vs J. Kent Trotter

LUX
1
Win
Played
1
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Rodesch 1 - 1 Trotter
They have played 4 sets in total, with Chris Rodesch winning 2 and James Kent Trotter winning 2. The last match between James Kent Trotter and Chris Rodesch was at the Ilkley Challenger, 09-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rodesch | 1 |
| Trotter | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Ilkley Challenger(06-09-25)
(SF) Drummondville Challenger(11-16-24)
C. Rodesch vs J. K. Trotter H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $66,000 | Career Prize Money | $144,555 |
| 69.44% (125-55) | Career Total W/L | 58.42% (118-84) |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
C. Rodesch vs J. K. Trotter Match Preview:
- Second serve performance has Trotter at 49.4% success in the last six months compared to Rodesch's 46.87%. Is this advantage significant? It might be as there's a high correlation with match outcomes.
- When looking at return stats, Trotter triumphs in winning 40.47% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Rodesch edges ahead in first serve returns with 26.63% effectiveness.
- In pressure scenarios, Trotter slightly outperforms Rodesch by saving 59.57% of breakpoints, while Rodesch manages 56.95%.
- Over the past year, Rodesch has played at a higher level, winning 76.34% of matches compared to Trotter's 61.02%.
- When examining surface preferences, Trotter excels on indoor hard courts, winning 65%, whereas Rodesch shows an exceptional 83% success on hard courts.
- Competition level shows Rodesch dominating at Futures/Satellites level with an 89.36% win rate, whereas Trotter competes mostly at Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 65.96%.
- In their only direct head-to-head match, Rodesch defeated Trotter convincingly in straight sets.
- Both players have matched their deciding set performance stats, each winning 74% of such situations over the previous year.
- Break point conversion comparison favors Trotter at 32.5%, against Rodesch's 26.88%, potentially crucial during pressure points in a match.
- If player quality is judged by opponent rank, Trotter faced challenging opponents with an average rank higher than that of Rodesch's past opponents.
Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performance metrics, Trotter has shown competence in crucial match areas such as second serve points and breakpoint conversions. These factors contribute positively to his in-game resilience.
However, Rodesch has demonstrated higher recent success rates in overall match wins and on the preferred surface, which suggests a prepared and tactical edge for the upcoming confrontation.
Taking into account their past head-to-head matchups and current form, Rodesch appears to have a statistical upper hand. Therefore, he is more likely to emerge victorious in this prospective contest.
Chris Rodesch vs James Kent Trotter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Rodesch vs J. K. Trotter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 17 | Games Won | 19 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:5:3 | Average Match Time | 1:5:3 |
| 73% (74/102) | 1st Serve % | 58% (59/102) |
| 76% (56/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (44/59) |
| 43% (12/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (23/43) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 34% (35/102) | Return Points Win % | 33% (34/102) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Rodesch Recent Matches Played
J. K. Trotter Recent Matches Played

C. Rodesch vs J. K. Trotter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.44% (125/55) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.42% (118/84) |
| 64.35% (269/149) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.78% (258/213) |
| 54.69% (2221/1840) | Games Win/Loss | 52.00% (2448/2260) |
| 80.85% (38/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.12% (68/49) |
| 72.50% (58/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 54.35% (25/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.64% (42/24) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.72 |
| 907 | Aces Total | 1654 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 498 | Total Double Faults | 584 |
| 1:34:24 | Average Match Time | 1:41:28 |
| 395.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.72 |
| 68% (7850/11567) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8183/13712) |
| 71% (5563/7850) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (6255/8183) |
| 51% (1914/3717) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2835/5529) |
| 41% (475/1166) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (408/1092) |
| 40% (4636/11663) | Return Points Win % | 36% (4946/13792) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 57.58% (38/28) | Challenger W/L | 60.84% (87/56) |
| 80.00% (80/20) | Futures W/L | 60.53% (23/15) |
| 70% (124/176) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (116/200) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (37/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (52/100) |
| 68% (39/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (45/69) |
| 91% (118/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (102/92) |
| 8% (118/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (102/10) |
| 29% (62/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (100/26) |